Determining Brain Death: AAN Calls for New Guidelines

Brain_Death

In a new position paper published in Neurology, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) defines death by neurologic criteria – commonly known as brain death – as the individual’s death due to irreversible loss of function of the entire brain in accordance with the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) a model state law that was approved for the U.S. in 1981. In the position paper the AAN proposed uniform brain death laws, policies and practices.

In a comment to MedPage Today, lead author James Russell, DO, MS, of Lahey Hospital said the statement has three goals.

“First, it provides AAN, American Neurological Association, and Child Neurological Society endorsement of the (UDDA’s) conclusion, which identified brain death as equivalent to cardiorespiratory death,” he said. “Second, it provides endorsement from all three organizations that the 2010 guidelines for adults and the 2011 guidelines for children are the currently and widely recognized medical standards for brain death determination.”

And third, it offers guidance about how to “reconcile requests to abstain from brain death testing or to continue organ-sustaining technology after a diagnosis of brain death has been rendered,” Russell said.

There have been no known cases where the adult or pediatric guidelines led to inaccurate determination of death with return of any brain function, including consciousness, brainstem reflexes or breathing, according to AAN. To date, the only state that requires using the guidelines as the medical standard for determining brain death is Nevada.

The UDDA definition of brain death has been accepted as legal death in every state but in most states, medical standards for determining brain death are unspecified.

Without specificity, mired by institutional inconsistency, the results have been differing interpretations in high-profile legal cases.

“The AAN statement was prompted by several recent medicolegal cases that highlighted controversies in brain death and questioned whether it should be considered an accepted and valid medical standard,” said James Bernat, MD of the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, who aided in the development the conceptual form of brain death that formed the basis of the UDDA.

The viewpoint of the AAN provides an “authoritative consensus declaration on the practice of brain death determination” Bernat told MedPage Today. “It clarifies that, despite legitimate areas of controversy, physicians conducting a brain death determination can feel secure that it represents the medical standard of care.”

Arthur Caplan, PhD, director of medical ethics at NYU Langone Hospital in New York City, who was not part of the AAN position paper team, opined that the problem is not just uncertainty about what constitutes brain death.

“It’s uncertainties about what power family members have to compel the continuation of treatment, even in the face of death,” Caplan told MedPage Today. “We see a swinging of the pendulum toward patient autonomy. Some doctors have become nervous and think they have to listen to patients, even when they’re asking for things that are impossible, or outside the standard of care, or simply wrong.

“This paper affirms that parental and family rights have limits, and family members shouldn’t be allowed to coerce treatments, while recognizing they do need accommodation in terms of explanations or meetings with ethics committees,” Caplan continued. “But death is not a state that requires continuation of treatment, and this paper says that pretty clearly.”

When families do not accept a determination of death and request continued life support, the AAN position statement provides guidance for clinicians in those circumstances. In addition, the position statement also supports legislation in every state, modeled after the Nevada statute; uniform policies in medical facilities that are in compliance with brain death guidelines, as well as programs to credential physicians to determine death by neurological criteria.

Brain Injury Lawyer

Brain injuries are the leading cause of patients being on life support. Brain injuries can cover a wide spectrum of complications from very mild to total debilitation and death. The cost of a brain injury in medical expenses, a lifetime of lost income and other costs can be in the millions. Add to that the loss of the quality of life, the pain and anguish of the patient and also loved ones. If you lost a loved one or a loved one was injured, it is important that you have the best legal representation. Our team of brain injury attorneys has helped countless victims of traumatic brain injury and their loved ones recovery significant awards to which they are legally entitled. Reach out to a brain injury lawyer today by calling 818-991-8900 or contact us online. There is no fee for a consultation.

By | 2019-02-02T00:44:24+00:00 February 2nd, 2019|Brain Injury|0 Comments

Leave A Comment

More Than 30 Years of Experience Fighting For the Victims of Negligence

Contact Us For A Free Confidential Consultation

Give us a call and our attorneys will guide you through the process of litigation and put together a legal team tailored to your needs. When necessary, we will help you find the best doctors to treat your injuries. Our team approach gives our clients a multitude of strengths and skills to rely on to successfully resolve their cases.

Call us at 818-991-8900 or
contact us online to set up a time to talk with our team about your case. If you are unable to come to our office in Westlake Village because of your injuries, we can come to you. If you are elsewhere in the country, we can work with you by phone, fax, email and other methods of communication.

Email Us For A Response

Are you a robot?4 + 2 =