Vititoe Law GroupPersonal Injury Lawyers
Over $1 Billion Recovered In Personal Injury Cases
By Jim Vititoe And His Firms
Free Initial Consultation
818-851-1886
NO RECOVERY • NO FEE

Essure Lawsuits Can Move Forward without Preemption California Judge Rules

Lawsuits totaling more than 900 have been filed in California against Bayer Healthcare for serious side effects caused by their contraceptive device Essure. Until early this month Bayer has successfully kept the door locked against more than 40,000 complaints related to Essure but a ruling by a judge in California may have smashed down that door.

Judge Winifred Smith of the Superior Court in Alameda County granted a motion in the beginning of October to coordinate 55 cases filed against Bayer. At the same time, she sided with the plaintiffs against Bayer concerning pre-emption. Bayer contended that plaintiffs were not allowed to file suit under federal preemption law, but the California court did not agree.

In addition to the preemption ruling, Bayer's headaches are compounded by a bi-partisan piece of legislation known as HR 5403 or Ariel Graces Law named for the invitro death of the baby girl blamed on the failure of Essure as a contraceptive. The legislation would allow lawsuits against drug makers for harm caused by defective medical devices. The law emanates from Riegel vs. Medtronic, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that protected manufacturers of certain medical devices from litigation.

Attorneys believe that the recent ruling will be instrumental in breaking down the door blocking thousands of cases, not only against Essure but many other defective medical devices present and future. Drug makers could no longer slip though that loop hole in the law. The hope of thousands of women rests in that decision which would make manufacturers accountable for their actions.

Some Disturbing History of Essure

Essure is a birth control device that was marketed by Bayer Healthcare as a safe and effective method of permanent birth control. It is a non-surgical method, consisting of two implants - one for each fallopian tube. Once in place the implants stimulate the growth of scar tissue which blocks the fallopian tube, preventing fertilization. Since Essure was released there have been complaints filed by thousands of women alleging serious complications including:

· Migration to outside the fallopian tube requiring hysterectomy

· Organ perforation

· Ectopic pregnancy

· Full term pregnancy

· Painful intercourse

· Heavy bleeding

· Migraines

· Back Pain

· Fatigue and depression

· Weight fluctuation

· Auto Immune Diseases

The clear majority of Essure complaints are from women, but there are also some by their spouses alleging loss of consortium.

In addition to the detrimental side effects claimed, the lawsuit also alleges that Bayer violated the FDA conditional premarket approval which was issued in 2002. The condition requiring Bayer to notify the FDA of over 16,000 reports of serious side effects was allegedly not followed. This failure to report invalidated the FDA approval of the product, making Essure adulterated, the lawsuit claims.

Filing an Essure Lawsuit Against Bayer

Typically, claims related to the detrimental side effects of Essure are filed individually as opposed to a class action. If you believe you have a claim against Bayer for severe side effects, due to the insertion of an Essure birth control device, it is imperative that you contact an attorney with experience concerning defective medical devices. You need a confident law firm who will stand firmly against a pharmaceutical giant. It is also important that you waste no time in filing as statutes of limitation apply and hesitating could cost you the opportunity to file. If you suffered adverse side effects caused by Essure you may be entitled to compensatory damages for medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, loss of consortium and more.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
More Than 30 Years of Experience Fighting For the Victims of Negligence

Contact Us For A Free Confidential Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Email Us For A Response

Corporate Office

Westlake Village
5707 Corsa Avenue
Second Floor
Westlake Village, CA 91362

Phone: 818-851-1886
Phone: 818-991-8900
Fax: 818-991-6200
Westlake Village Law Office Map

Downtown L.A.
1055 W. 7th Street Floor 33, Suite 54
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Phone: 818-851-1886
Phone: 213-839-8800
Los Angeles Law Office Map

Oxnard
309 South A Street, Suite #101
Oxnard, CA 93030

Phone: 818-851-1886
Phone: 805-385-3200
Fax: 805-385-3100
Oxnard Law Office Map

Orange County
38 Corporate Park
Suite 44
Irvine, CA 92606

Phone: 818-851-1886
Phone: 949-791-2770
Irvine Law Office Map

Palmdale
190 Sierra CT
B-111
Palmdale, CA 93550

Phone: 818-851-1886
Phone: 661-273-5600
Palmdale Law Office Map